Academic Integrity Policy
- Each college/school has an Academic Integrity Policy Committee:
- a. to propose policies for dealing with problems of academic dishonesty including but not limited to plagiarism and cheating, and to ensure that these policies and procedures are consistent with University policies and procedures;
- b. to implement policies and procedures for dealing with academic dishonesty; and
- c. to review appeals from academic evaluations associated with academic dishonesty. (See“Suggested Hearing Guidelines”.)
- Academic dishonesty is an encompassing term involving any activity that seeks to gain credit for work one has not done or to deliberately damage or destroy the work of others. Plagiarism is defined as misrepresenting another’s ideas, phrases, discourse or works as one’s own. Cheating is defined as the act, or attempted act, of giving or obtaining aid and/or information by illicit means in meeting any academic requirements, including examinations. (See “Examples of Academic Dishonesty”.)
- The composition of the committee is determined by each college/school with consideration given to including both faculty and students.
- The penalty for academic dishonesty will vary from incident to incident, depending upon the scope and magnitude of the offense and the circumstances in which it occurred; upon the prior record of the person being penalized; and upon evidence suggesting the existence or absence of a pattern of academic dishonesty in the academic performance of the person committing the offense.
If it is determined by the instructor that the student is guilty of academic misconduct, it is the prerogative of the instructor to assign the appropriate penalty in the course. Included among the possible penalties that may be imposed by the instructor are a reprimand, grade reduction (including assignment of a failing grade), or dismissal from the course with a failing grade.
All such actions must be reported by the instructor to the dean of the college/school in which the incident occurred. For information purposes, the dean should report the incident to the dean of the college/school in which the student is enrolled and may forward the case to the Academic Integrity Policy Committee for further action.
The committee may make a recommendation to the dean concerning whether probation, suspension or dismissal from the University should be imposed.
- Each college/school must have procedures to be used by its committee to address appeals from actions taken as a result of an instructor’s determination that a student’s performance involved academic dishonesty.
If, after appeal, it is determined that there is insufficient evidence of academic dishonesty, the instructor is bound by that finding and may only evaluate the assignment as to its content or other time-honored bases of academic evaluation.
- The appeals procedure must include provisions that address the following:
- a. how the appeals process is initiated, and by whom;
- b. a timetable, including the date by which an appeal must be initiated;
- c. steps to be taken in the appeals process;
- d. the nature of the documentation of evidence required or permitted;
- e. the rules applicable in hearings if a hearing is required.
- The policies and procedures of the college/school in which the alleged offense occurs are applicable in each instance. In the event that the student is not a member of the college/school in which the alleged offense occurs, the dean of that college/school must report the offense and its disposition to the dean of the student’s college/school for further action, if appropriate. If a recommendation is made for probation, suspension or dismissal from the University, this recommendation must be forwarded for final action to the dean of the college/school in which the student is enrolled. A copy of the recommendation and subsequent action by the dean of the student’s college/school must be sent to the provost.
- College/school policies and procedures must be consistent with University policies and procedures. In the event of inconsistencies, University policies and procedures shall prevail.
Suggested Hearing Guidelines:
These are suggested guidelines that may be refined in each instance, if the college/school desires, in consultation with the legal counsel of the University.
- The hearing shall be informal, and formal rules of evidence need not apply.
- The hearing shall be private; it shall be attended only by the members of the committee, the student and the instructor; there may be advisers for the committee, the student and the instructor, and when called, witnesses for the parties. However, a party’s adviser may not serve as a witness.
- At the request of either party or the committee, the proceedings shall be tape-recorded. A written transcript shall not be required.
- The hearing shall begin with the presentation of an opening statement by the instructor, summarizing concisely the basis of the actions taken or the practices at issue.
- The student shall then present an opening statement, summarizing concisely the basis for the appeal.
- The instructor may then support his/her presentation by the testimony of witnesses and by other evidence. The student and the committee may question the instructor and the witnesses; the student’s adviser or counsel may not question the instructor or the witnesses.
- The student may support his/her presentation by the testimony of witnesses or other evidence.
- The instructor and the committee may question the student and the witnesses; the instructor’s adviser or counsel may not question the student or the witnesses.
- At the close of the evidence presented by the student, the instructor shall be given the opportunity to introduce rebuttal testimony, which must be limited to any matters that have been raised in the testimony presented by or in behalf of the student.
- After all evidence has been presented, the instructor may make a final argument, after which the student may make a final argument.
Examples of academic dishonesty include, but are not limited to:
- copying from another student’s paper, laboratory report or other report, or computer files and listings;
- using, during a test or laboratory experiment, material and/or devices not authorized by theperson in charge of the test;
- without the instructor’s permission, collaborating with another, knowingly assisting another or knowingly receiving the assistance of another in writing an examination or in satisfying any other course requirements;
- incorporating into written assignments materials written by others without giving them credit, or otherwise improperly using information written by others (including that which might be stored on computer disks or other technological devices); buying and submitting commercially prepared papers as one’s own;
- submission of multiple copies of the same or similar papers without prior approval of the several instructors involved;
- claiming as one’s own work that which was done by tutors or others with no mention of credit to or the assistance of those persons;
- deliberately damaging or destroying another’s laboratory experiments, computer work or studio work;
- knowingly obtaining access to, using, buying, selling, stealing, transporting or soliciting in its entirety or in part, the contents of a test or other assignment unauthorized for release;
- substituting for another student, or permitting another student to substitute for oneself, to take a test or other assignment or to make a presentation;
- intentional and unauthorized falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic exercise;
- forgery, alterations or misuse of University documents;
- falsifying information submitted or failure to reveal relevant information in any University application form or offering any false information in any University disciplinary proceeding.